Swagger SDK Generator: Generate Client Libraries and Stubs

Most API companies start with Swagger Codegen or OpenAPI Generator because the promise is compelling: generate SDKs for 50+ languages with a single command. The reality is different—you get basic HTTP wrappers that lack retries, proper error handling, pagination helpers, and idiomatic language patterns that developers expect from production SDKs.

This article breaks down why basic code generation falls short for production use cases, the hidden engineering costs of maintaining forked templates, and how modern SDK platforms solve these problems while adding AI-era features like Model Context Protocol support. You’ll learn what separates basic wrappers from production-grade SDKs and how to evaluate your options for building developer tools that actually ship.

What Swagger codegen promises vs delivers

A Swagger SDK generator, like the original Swagger Codegen or its popular fork OpenAPI Generator, is a tool that automatically creates client SDKs from an OpenAPI specification, similar to how the Stainless SDK generator works but with different capabilities. It works by using a template-driven engine to generate code, promising to simplify the process of building API integrations. The appeal is strong: run one command and get functional SDKs in over 50 languages, saving your team countless hours.

For example, you can generate a basic TypeScript client with a single command:

This command parses your API spec and outputs a set of files that wrap your HTTP endpoints. However, the promise of a one-click solution quickly meets the reality of production requirements. The generated code is a starting point, but it is far from the polished, reliable, and developer-friendly library your users expect.

How basic SDK generation works

The generation process is a straightforward pipeline. You provide an OpenAPI spec, the generator applies a language-specific template, and it outputs a directory of code. This code typically includes models for your API’s data structures and API classes with methods for each endpoint.

This approach gets you a client that can make requests, but it leaves many critical features for you to build yourself.

• Authentication: It might handle a basic API key in a header, but complex OAuth flows are out of scope.

• Error Handling: You get raw HTTP errors, not idiomatic language-specific exceptions that developers can easily catch and handle.

• Retries: Network blips happen. The generated code doesn’t automatically retry failed requests, leaving it to every single user to implement their own retry logic.

• Pagination: For list endpoints, the generator creates a method that takes limit and offset parameters, but it doesn’t provide helpers to easily iterate through all pages of results.

These gaps mean the generated SDK is more of a scaffold than a finished product, reinforcing why your API isn’t finished until the SDK ships.

The true cost of open-source DKS generators

Maintaining an SDK from an open-source tool creates a significant and often hidden engineering tax. The initial generation is fast, but the long-term cost of ownership quickly adds up as you work to make the SDK production-ready.

Enterprise maintenance burden

To fix bugs or add missing features, you must fork the generator’s templates and start patching them. This creates an internal fork that your team is now responsible for maintaining indefinitely. You have to pull in upstream changes, resolve merge conflicts, and manage a complex templating language, diverting focus from your core API.

Non-idiomatic code problems

Open-source generators often produce code that feels foreign to developers who are experts in a particular language. You might find Java-style patterns in your Python SDK or confusing naming conventions that don’t match community standards, such as issues with making Java enums forwards compatible in a way that feels natural to Java developers. This non-idiomatic code increases the learning curve for your users and leads to a frustrating developer experience.

Missing critical features

A production SDK needs more than just endpoint wrappers. Key features like automatic retries with exponential backoff, helpers for streaming responses, and seamless file uploads are almost always missing. Your team is left to build these foundational features from scratch for every language you support, duplicating effort and creating inconsistencies.

What separates basic SDKs from production SDKs

The difference between a basic wrapper and a production-grade SDK lies in the developer experience. A great SDK feels like it was handcrafted by an expert in that language, anticipating the developer’s needs and removing boilerplate.

Instead of forcing you to fork templates, a modern generation platform allows you to add custom code directly to the SDK repository. These changes, like adding a custom helper method, are preserved through a semantic merge process on the next generation. This gives you the efficiency of codegen with the flexibility of handcrafted code.

Furthermore, integrated diagnostics alert you to issues when creating OpenAPI specs, preventing you from shipping a broken SDK. Instead of discovering a problem after a release, you get a failed build with a clear error message, allowing you to fix the issue before it ever reaches your users.

Build SDKs for the AI era with MCP support

In today’s AI-driven landscape, APIs need to be accessible to not just humans, but also to language models and agents. The Model Context Protocol (MCP) is an open standard that provides a universal way for LLMs to discover and interact with your API’s capabilities. A standard SDK is not enough, as it is not machine-discoverable by an AI agent.

You can automatically generate an MCP server directly from your OpenAPI spec. This is as simple as adding a few lines to your configuration file to enable the mcp_server target.

For example, in your stainless.yaml:

# stainless.yaml
targets:
  typescript:
    package_name: your_package_name
    production_repo: null
    publish:
      npm: false
    options:
      # Enable the MCP server subpackage
      mcp_server:
        package_name: your_package_name_mcp  # defaults to <package_name>-mcp
        enable_all_resources: true

By adding this to your Stainless config, you generate a subpackage called your_package_name_mcp (defaults to <package_name>-mcp) that AI agents can use to discover your API endpoints.

This process of converting from API to MCP creates tools that LLMs can use to perform actions. For example, an agent can ask, "what products are available?" The MCP server understands this request, invokes the correct GET /products endpoint through your SDK, and returns the result to the agent in a structured format.

Advanced features like dynamic tools allow LLMs to work with very large APIs by discovering endpoints at runtime, avoiding context window limitations. Client capability detection automatically adjusts the tool schemas to work around limitations in different AI clients like Cursor or Claude, ensuring broad compatibility without any extra work.

The path to production-grade sdks

You have a few options for your SDK strategy. You can continue patching open-source generators, dedicate a team to building and maintaining them in-house, or adopt a platform designed for this purpose. The right choice depends on how much you value your developers’ time and your users’ experience.

Moving to a managed platform is straightforward. You can import your existing OpenAPI spec, instantly preview the generated SDKs in an interactive studio, and configure everything from authentication to pagination. Once configured, including editing configs and OpenAPI specs with branches, you can set up a GitHub Action to automatically generate, test, and publish new SDK versions whenever your API changes.

This automated workflow keeps your SDKs perfectly in sync with your API, ensuring your users always have access to the latest features without any manual intervention from your team.

Frequently asked questions about production sdk development

This section covers some common questions engineers have when moving beyond basic SDK generation and investing in a production-grade developer experience.

How much engineering time do generated SDKs really require?

While the initial generation is quick, maintaining an SDK from an open-source tool requires significant ongoing effort in patching templates, fixing bugs, and adding features. A managed platform automates this, reducing the maintenance burden to near zero.

Can production SDKs include custom business logic?

Yes, a key feature of a modern SDK platform is the ability to add custom code, like bespoke helper methods, directly into the generated SDK. These manual changes are preserved across future generations.

How do you handle breaking API changes gracefully?

Production-grade SDKs use automated semantic versioning based on your commit messages. Breaking changes automatically increment the major version, and release PRs with detailed changelogs are created for your review before publishing.

What is the ROI of investing in production SDKs?

The return on investment comes from improved developer experience metrics. You’ll see faster integration times for your users, a significant reduction in support tickets related to API usage, and higher overall adoption of your API.

How do you add MCP servers to existing APIs?

You can add an MCP server to any API with an OpenAPI spec by enabling the feature in your configuration. You can then select which endpoints to expose as tools and deploy the server for local or remote use.

Ready to ship SDKs your developers will love? Get started for free.